Difference between revisions of "Talk:Polymerization Deck"
m |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
New idea: Each thing has an Element and a Type that serve as its keywords. <BR>Dark Magician - Dark, Wizard.--[[User:ChippyYYZ|ChippyYYZ]] 21:59, 6 July 2008 (BST) | New idea: Each thing has an Element and a Type that serve as its keywords. <BR>Dark Magician - Dark, Wizard.--[[User:ChippyYYZ|ChippyYYZ]] 21:59, 6 July 2008 (BST) | ||
That's a good idea, you mean this, right? | |||
Example | |||
Cheetah | |||
Element: life | |||
Type: fast | |||
Hurricane | |||
Element: air | |||
Type: fast | |||
So you can combine these because the type is the same. | |||
[[User:Natanz|Natanz]] 12:09, 7 July 2008 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 11:09, 7 July 2008
Sounds interesting... what is the gameplay like?
Natanz 14:20, 1 July 2008 (BST)
Things will have keywords telling what they can combine with. Example: Charizard - Fire, Dragon, Flying. Other than that I have less than or equal to no idea. Yet.--ChippyYYZ 17:02, 1 July 2008 (BST)
Feel free to add any cards you think would be good. Things can come from Anywhere.--ChippyYYZ 17:16, 1 July 2008 (BST)
If you want to add a card that might be considered a bit silly, that's fine.--ChippyYYZ 04:25, 6 July 2008 (BST)
Suggestions:
1 Use only 4 keywords (maybe 5). Else you end up with many cards that can't combine.
2 You could call the keywords 'elements'.
3 Action card: Forced combine: combine two things that don't share a keyword/element.
Natanz 13:26, 6 July 2008 (BST)
New idea: Each thing has an Element and a Type that serve as its keywords.
Dark Magician - Dark, Wizard.--ChippyYYZ 21:59, 6 July 2008 (BST)
That's a good idea, you mean this, right?
Example
Cheetah Element: life Type: fast
Hurricane Element: air Type: fast
So you can combine these because the type is the same.
Natanz 12:09, 7 July 2008 (BST)
