Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unplayable Dvorak deck"
Zaratustra (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Sure, let's give it a try. -- [[User:Zaratustra|Zaratustra]] 20:00, 20 October 2007 (BST) | Sure, let's give it a try. -- [[User:Zaratustra|Zaratustra]] 20:00, 20 October 2007 (BST) | ||
Wouldn't Playing With A Full Deck be an easy win in this deck? It doesn't have any commands to fulfill, as such. Perhaps "Play only if you control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club; you win the game," or "If you do not control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club, you may not win the game." [[User:Binarius|Binarius]] 03:21, 13 August 2008 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 02:21, 13 August 2008
As far as long-term planning goes, I think it would be wise to change the special rule to: "If a player successfuly plays any card of the Unplayable Dvorak deck and fulfills all of its commands, they win the game and the card is removed from the deck archive. If the card is a Thing they must continue to follow its commands until the end of the turn."
-Bucky
Sure, let's give it a try. -- Zaratustra 20:00, 20 October 2007 (BST)
Wouldn't Playing With A Full Deck be an easy win in this deck? It doesn't have any commands to fulfill, as such. Perhaps "Play only if you control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club; you win the game," or "If you do not control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club, you may not win the game." Binarius 03:21, 13 August 2008 (BST)
