Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unplayable Dvorak deck"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Wouldn't Playing With A Full Deck be an easy win in this deck? It doesn't have any commands to fulfill, as such. Perhaps "Play only if you control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club; you win the game," or "If you do not control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club, you may not win the game." [[User:Binarius|Binarius]] 03:21, 13 August 2008 (BST) | Wouldn't Playing With A Full Deck be an easy win in this deck? It doesn't have any commands to fulfill, as such. Perhaps "Play only if you control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club; you win the game," or "If you do not control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club, you may not win the game." [[User:Binarius|Binarius]] 03:21, 13 August 2008 (BST) | ||
Everybody Likes Them seems like another instant win. Perhaps "Only cards which mention puppies in their titles may be played"? [[User:Binarius|Binarius]] 21:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:17, 20 September 2009
As far as long-term planning goes, I think it would be wise to change the special rule to: "If a player successfuly plays any card of the Unplayable Dvorak deck and fulfills all of its commands, they win the game and the card is removed from the deck archive. If the card is a Thing they must continue to follow its commands until the end of the turn."
-Bucky
Sure, let's give it a try. -- Zaratustra 20:00, 20 October 2007 (BST)
Wouldn't Playing With A Full Deck be an easy win in this deck? It doesn't have any commands to fulfill, as such. Perhaps "Play only if you control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club; you win the game," or "If you do not control a Heart, a Diamond, a Spade, and a Club, you may not win the game." Binarius 03:21, 13 August 2008 (BST)
Everybody Likes Them seems like another instant win. Perhaps "Only cards which mention puppies in their titles may be played"? Binarius 21:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
