Difference between revisions of "Talk:Public School deck"
m |
m |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|text=Draw a card for each friend you control}} | |text=Draw a card for each friend you control}} | ||
<br clear=all> | <br clear=all> | ||
I think it's somewhat too much chance and not skill. I mean, if someone plays a card and you have one to counter it, you would always play it. The gameplay is basically: you put down a card and your opponent can destroy it if she has the right card. If you want to play a girlfriend you need another card (prankster for example), if you have it you play it, else you'll have to wait for it. See what I mean? | I think it's somewhat too much chance and not skill. I mean, if someone plays a card and you have one to counter it, you would always play it. The gameplay is basically: you put down a card and your opponent can destroy it if she has the right card. If you want to play a girlfriend you need another card (prankster for example), if you have it you play it, else you'll have to wait for it. See what I mean? | ||
Revision as of 15:53, 23 December 2008
Nice idea, have you tested it much? Natanz 22:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
I have tested it. I want to test it with 3 or more players still. It works alright but sometimes its rather long and sometimes its really short. I had more cards in mind but it pushed the deck count too far and the HWs would be drowned.
Some of my ideas were
I think it's somewhat too much chance and not skill. I mean, if someone plays a card and you have one to counter it, you would always play it. The gameplay is basically: you put down a card and your opponent can destroy it if she has the right card. If you want to play a girlfriend you need another card (prankster for example), if you have it you play it, else you'll have to wait for it. See what I mean?
How you could solve this and make the game more skill-based? That would be difficult but it would be worth trying to figure out. Or do you see it differently?
Natanz 15:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
