Difference between revisions of "Talk:Technopoly deck"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
--[[User:CK|CK]] 00:17, 8 September 2007 (BST) | --[[User:CK|CK]] 00:17, 8 September 2007 (BST) | ||
:Good thinking. I've added it all to the page. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 15:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Oh and an important note.== | |||
Don't play this game with two players. It sucks. Really, really badly.--[[User:CK|CK]] 15:46, 9 September 2007 (BST) | Don't play this game with two players. It sucks. Really, really badly.--[[User:CK|CK]] 15:46, 9 September 2007 (BST) | ||
I know what you mean. ;) --[[User:Xahn Borealis|Xahn Borealis]] 17:38, 19 September 2007 (BST) | I know what you mean. ;) --[[User:Xahn Borealis|Xahn Borealis]] 17:38, 19 September 2007 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 15:28, 5 November 2007
Suggestions for MUSHing with this deck
Make all cards Actions, so that played cards go straight to the discard pile (which then quickly becomes the draw pile) and players have some sort of chance of drawing them again without creating obscene (and limiting, no matter the degree of obscenity involved) numbers of duplicate cards. Then, when an Object is invented/discovered, the player creates and plays a new card using the Object's name as the title and its attributes as the text. The amount of the object a player posesses can be indicated with status; to give Mining Rights or Technology, merely create an exact duplicate of the card in question and givething to the other player.
Your thoughts. I desire them.
--CK 00:17, 8 September 2007 (BST)
- Good thinking. I've added it all to the page. --Kevan 15:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh and an important note.
Don't play this game with two players. It sucks. Really, really badly.--CK 15:46, 9 September 2007 (BST)
I know what you mean. ;) --Xahn Borealis 17:38, 19 September 2007 (BST)
