Difference between revisions of "User talk:Bucky"
(→RTS) |
(→RTS) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== RTS == | == RTS == | ||
Thanks for your advice. I definitely want it to be rock-paper-scissors | Thanks for your advice. I definitely want it to be rock-paper-scissors style as, like I said, this is going to be similar to Command & Conquer, which uses that style. I want it to be so that you can choose your strategy in the same way, i.e., Rusher, Turtle, Steamroller, etc. rock-paper-scissors always seems interesting to me, tactically. I might use a similar combat sequence to my [[Halo: Starside deck]], that is, put your attacking units into play and use an Action to start combat with all units in play.--[[User:Xahn Borealis|Xahn Borealis]] 13:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 14 November 2008
Spambots
That was actually a rogue spambot editing the time-travel CCG - I don't know why they're doing it, but they seem to take the wiki source of a page and feed it through something that converts plus signs to spaces and cuts out entirely at non-ASCII characters, before pasting it all back in.
I picture them as long-forgotten spambots in a Taiwanese warehouse, who've crossed out all the shut-down spam sites from their list of sites to advertise, and are just idly churning through wiki pages, with nothing left to add... --Kevan 19:19, 5 June 2007 (BST)
RTS
Thanks for your advice. I definitely want it to be rock-paper-scissors style as, like I said, this is going to be similar to Command & Conquer, which uses that style. I want it to be so that you can choose your strategy in the same way, i.e., Rusher, Turtle, Steamroller, etc. rock-paper-scissors always seems interesting to me, tactically. I might use a similar combat sequence to my Halo: Starside deck, that is, put your attacking units into play and use an Action to start combat with all units in play.--Xahn Borealis 13:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
