Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Star decks"
From Dvorak - A Blank-Card Game
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Not really sure what the best system would be for promoting playable decks to "star" status, but I suppose any game that one player nominates (as having played and enjoyed), and another pl...) |
Zaratustra (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not really sure what the best system would be for promoting playable decks to "star" status, but I suppose any game that one player nominates (as having played and enjoyed), and another player seconds would be fair enough. Anyone want to get things started? --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 18:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | Not really sure what the best system would be for promoting playable decks to "star" status, but I suppose any game that one player nominates (as having played and enjoyed), and another player seconds would be fair enough. Anyone want to get things started? --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 18:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
# I don't think I've played any of these more than once, but I know people like the [[Tabloid Headline deck]]. [[User:Zaratustra|Zaratustra]] 20:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:44, 20 February 2007
Not really sure what the best system would be for promoting playable decks to "star" status, but I suppose any game that one player nominates (as having played and enjoyed), and another player seconds would be fair enough. Anyone want to get things started? --Kevan 18:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think I've played any of these more than once, but I know people like the Tabloid Headline deck. Zaratustra 20:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
